Cost and Time Comparison Analysis Using Microsoft Project (Case Study: Phase VII Work of the Surabaya Tanjung Perak Berlian Pier Structure Strengthening Project)

Authors

  • Mohammad Rizal Mantovani Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Michella Beatrix Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v8i2.1110

Keywords:

CPM, Microsoft Project, RAB Rescheduling

Abstract

Sometimes the execution of a project does not proceed smoothly because there are barriers that impede the present work. Uncertain weather conditions are one of the most common challenges encountered in the field during the Tanjung Perak Diamond Pier Structure Strengthening project in Surabaya. This is because the initial planning did not account for the weather conditions that would occur during the project's implementation. As a result, rescheduling is carried out to generate a reasonable and realistic timetable. Many strategies are employed in scheduling, with the expectation that the method will help in planning and scheduling. The goal of this research is to determine the time necessary for project implementation after rescheduling. This research is analytical in character. Secondary data, such as schedules and Budget Plans (RAB), are collected by directly requesting the necessary data from related parties, then evaluating the initial schedule, and finally preparing a new schedule using Microsoft Project tools and the Critical Path Method (CPM).  The results of this study obtained a rescheduling duration of 99 days, 22 days faster than the actual planned duration of 121 days, and a fee of IDR. 28,535,441,605 of the initial planned cost of IDR. 35,017,986,296.10.              

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslam, & T.M Kamaludin, View of Rescheduling the Palu V Bridge Construction Project Using Microsoft Project, 2021.

Beatrix, M., Lukmansyah, I., Oskar, D., & Muin, E. A, Analisa Metode Critical Path Methodpada Proyek Pembangunan Elyon Christian School S Urabaya. In MITSU" Media Informasi Teknik Sipil UNIJA (Vol. 7, Issue 2), 2019.

Ervianto, W.I. 2018. Teori Aplikasi Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Salemba Empat. Yogyakarta

Han-Seong Gwak, Sang-Hyuk Son, Young-Jun P, & Dong-Eun Lee, Exact Time-Cost Tradeoff, 2016.

Ilwaru, V. Y. I., Rahakbauw, D. L., & Tetimelay, J, Penjadwalan Waktu Proyek Pembangunan Rumah dengan Menggunakan CPM (Critical Path Method), 2018.

I put Dody Lesmana.& Elly Antika, Manajemen Proyek dengan Scrum, CV. Absolute Media, 2019.

Marina & Retna Hapsari Kartadipura, Pondok Darul Hijrah Putera Martapura, 2021

Maulidi, A., Arifin, S., & Suyoso, D. H, Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi Menggunakan Critical Path Method (Stusi Kasus: Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu Fakultas Teknik Universitas Jember). In MITSU" Media Informasi Teknik Sipil UNIJA (Vol. 9, Issue 1), 2021.

Nurhayati, Manajemen Proyek. Cetakan Pertama, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2020.

Onur, D & C. Stoy, Conceptual Estimation of Construction Costs Using the Multistep Ahead Approach, 2016.

Ramdhani, Fitra, Analisis Biaya dan Waktu dengan Metode Earned Value Concept Pada Proyek BJDM Area RL Construction At Well 32-21B Area 9 PT. Adhi Karya CS Work Unit Rate Pacagea-Duri. Jurnal Ilmiah, Fakultas, 2016.

Teknik Universitas Abdurrab, Pekanbaru.Rizky, F. M., & Nugraheni, F, Analisis Penjadwalan Ulang (Reschedulling) Proyek Masjid Muhammad Ali Al-Hind As- Syahiyarhamuhullah dengan Metode Precedence Diagram Method, 2019.

Santoso, A, Analisis Percepatan Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Proyek Menggunakan Critical Path Method (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Pasar Baru Kota Probolinggo), 2019.

Siswanto, Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2019.

Soehendradjati, RJB., Draft kuliah : Manajemen Kontruksi, Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2019.

Umbu, F., Dappa, L., Sari, S. N., & Hermawan, A, Analisis Penjadwalan Waktu Menggunakan Metode CPM (Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Gedung SMP Negeri 3 Saptosari, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta). EQUILIB, 03(01), 35–44, 2022.

Utomo, F. P, Penjadwalan Ulang Proyek Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode PDM dan CPM (Studi Kasus Pada Pembangunan Toserba Yogya di Pekalongan). In UJM (Vol. 10, Issue 1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujm, 2021.

Virginia M. Sorongan, Ariestides K. T, Dundu, Jermias Tjakra, Analisa Penjadwalan Proyek Menggunakan Metode PDM Dengan Menggunakan Konsep Cadangan Waktu Pada Proyek Peningkatan Ruas Jalan Tondano-Kembes-Manado Seksi 2, 2022.

Widiasanti, Irika dan Lenggogeni, Manajemen konstruksi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.

Y. Rahmat Akbar, Mar’aini, Penentuan Jalur Kritis untuk Manajemen Proyek ( Studi Kasus Pembangunan Jalan Selensen – Kota Baru – Bagan Jaya), 2022.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

Rizal Mantovani, M., & Beatrix, M. (2023). Cost and Time Comparison Analysis Using Microsoft Project (Case Study: Phase VII Work of the Surabaya Tanjung Perak Berlian Pier Structure Strengthening Project). Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan, 8(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v8i2.1110

Issue

Section

Jurnal CIVILA