Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • Jurnal TEKNIKA mempunyai ketentuan Minimal 1 penulis dan maksimal 5 penulis
  • File pengiriman dalam format file dokumen (doc, docx.), mengikuti pedoman penulis dan template artikel . Pastikan Anda menggunakan Mendeley atau fitur References pada Ms. Word untuk membantu dalam penulisan referensi.
    Kesalahan dalam mengikuti pedoman dapat berakibat penolakan dari naskah Anda.
  • Harap pastikan bahwa penulis memahami dan mengikuti persyaratan ini sebelum melanjutkan dengan langkah selanjutnya dalam pengiriman artikel.
    Kiriman belum pernah dipublikasikan , atau belum ada sebelum jurnal lain untuk dipertimbangkan (atau penjelasan telah diberikan dalam Komentar untuk Editor).
    Penulis terikat dengan Kebijakan Plagiarisme kami, oleh karena itu pertimbangan yang cermat harus dilakukan sebelum mengirimkan artikel. Dalam keadaan apa pun yang TEKNIKA temukan artikel telah atau diterbitkan di tempat lain yang identik dengan yang diterbitkan di TEKNIKA , kami akan menarik kembali artikel mengikuti pedoman COPE tentang mencabut artikel dan memberi tahu penulis.
  • Masukkan nomor Whatsapp Anda di bidang komentar untuk memudahkan editor menghubungi Anda jika email Anda memiliki masalah.
  • Pastikan Anda telah melihat APC (Biaya Penulis)

Author Guidelines

PANDUAN BAGI PENULIS Teknika (Jurnal Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Lamongan)

Jurnal Teknika: Jurnal Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Lamongan yang mencakup atikel dalam bidang Teknik Informatika, Teknik Sipil dan Teknik Elektro. Jurnal ini menerima artikel dari berbagai kalangan, baik dari dosen, praktisi, akademisi, peneliti dari dalam dan luar kampus universitas islam lamongan.


Tata Cara Penyampaian Naskah: penulis mengirimkan naskah dalam bentuk file elektronik dengan cara mengunggahnya melalui halaman pengguna pada menu login pada Online Journal System (OJS). Setelah proses review oleh mitra bestari, naskah tersebut akan dikembalikan untuk dilakukan revisi, ditolak, atau diterima tanpa revisi. Hasil revisi segera dikirimkan kembali ke redaksi melalui halaman pengguna.

Format: naskah ditulis dengan bahasa Indonesia dalam kaidah bahasa yang baku. Format penulisan penulis dapat menyesuaikan template yang telah disediakan.

Sistematika: Judul, Abstract, Pendahuluan, Metodologi, Hasil & Pembahasan, Kesimpulan, Saran (bila deiperlukan), Ucapan Terima Kasih (bila diperlukan), dan Daftar Pustaka.

Judul: Ringkas, jelas dan menunjukkan adanya kajian/analisis terhadap masalah/topik yang dikaji, maksimal 15 kata, ukuran huruf 12 dan cetak tebal.(sesuaikan aturan template)

Atribut: Nama & Institusi penulis, alamat kontak (telp. /Fax./email). Ditulis di bawah judul.

Abstrak: Ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Inggris dengan jarak antar baris 1 (satu) spasi; ditulis dalam satu paragraph (150-250 kata) yang mencakup: latar belakang, tujuan dan/atau ruang lingkup penelitian, metode yang digunakan, ringkasan hasil/finding dan simpulan.

Kata Kunci: ditulis terpisah 1 spasi di bawah abstrak, kata/istilah/pengertian yang penting maksimal 6 kata.

Pendahuluan: secara singkat menjelaskan latar belakang umum kajian, memuat State of The Art untuk menjustifikasi atau menguatkan pernyataan novelty atau signifikansi atau kontribusi ilmiah atau orisinalitas dari artikel ini dan harus ada rujukan ke artikel dari jurnal 10 tahun terakhir yang memperkuat justifikasi orisinalitas atau kontribusi tersebut. Dalam format naskah ilmiah tidak diperkenankan adanya tinjauan pustaka sebagaimana di laporan penelitian.

Sebelum menuliskan tujuan kajian, harus ada Gap Analysis atau pernyataan kesenjangan (orisinalitas) atau pernyataan kontribusi kebaruan (novelty statement) secara jelas dan eksplisit, atau perbedaan yang unik dari penelitian ini jika dibanding dengan penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya, juga dari sisi penting tidaknya penelitian tersebut dilakukan. Tujuan penelitian ditulis secara lugas dan jelas. BUKAN seperti ini (Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, maka tujuan penelitian ini).

Metodologi: penjelasan singkat mengenai masalah, bahan atau instrumen serta metode yang digunakan.

Hasil dan Pembahasan: pemaparan hasil dan pembahasan secara runtut dan komprehensif serta mengarah kepada pemecahan masalah. Hasil dan Pembahasan setidaknya memuat: (1). (unsur what/how) apakah data yang disajikan telah diolah (bukan data mentah), dituangkan dalam bentuk tabel atau gambar (pilih salah satu), serta diberi keterangan yang mudah dipahami? Tuliskan temuan atau finding-nya, tetapi jangan dibahas pembahasannya di bagian ini; (2). (unsur why) pada bagian pembahasan terlihat adanya kaitan antara hasil yang diperoleh dan konsep dasar dan/atau hipotesis? Pembahasan yang dibuat harus ditunjang fakta yang nyata dan jelas; dan (3) (unsur what else) apakah ada kesesuaian atau pertentangan dengan hasil penelitian orang lain?

Kesimpulan: kesimpulan ditulis jelas, singkat dan sistematis serta menjawab permasalahan atau tujuan.

Ucapan Terima Kasih (opsional).

Daftar Pustaka: sistematika penulisan daftar pustaka sesuai dengan APA style 6th edition dengan rujukan diusahakan minimum 80% berasal dari literatur primer/jurnal ilmiah.

Jurnal Teknika

Jurnal Teknika is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewer­­­­­s and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Teknika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society. Lembaga Penelitian, Pengembangan, dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP3M) Universitas Islam Lamongan as publisher of Jurnal Teknika takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the LP3M UNISLA and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary. Publication decisions The editors of the Jurnal Teknika are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Fair play An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and conflicts of interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Duties of Reviewers Contribution to Editorial Decisions Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Promptness Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Standards of Objectivity Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgment of Sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Duties of Authors Reporting standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Data Access and Retention Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. Originality and Plagiarism The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Acknowledgment of Sources Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Authorship of the Paper Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.