Analysis of the Center of Gravity and Moment of Inertia of Concrete Beam and Column Cross-Sections Using Manual and AutoCAD Methods in a Simple Building: the Barracks of Infantry Bengkulu

Authors

  • Nazmi Aprilla Wibowo Universitas Al - Azhar Medan
  • Simon Petrus Hamonangan Simorangkir Universitas Al - Azhar Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v11i2.1722

Keywords:

AutoCAD, Concrete Beams and Columns, Manual Method, Moment of Inertia, Center of Gravity

Abstract

Concrete beams and columns are important structural elements that support the strength, stability, and safety of a building. This study aims to compare the centroid and moment of inertia of concrete beam and column cross-sections calculated using manual methods and AutoCAD in the Barracks D project of the 847th TP Infantry Battalion in Bengkulu. This study uses a descriptive comparative method. The analysis was conducted on cross-sections in the support areas, namely B1–K1 and B2–KP, and in the field areas, namely B1, B2, and K1. AutoCAD modeling was carried out using Polyline, Region, and Massprop commands to determine the geometric properties of each cross-section. The results show that the field-area cross-sections have very similar results between the manual and AutoCAD methods. The difference in centroid coordinates was 0.00%, while the moment of inertia deviation was very small, approximately 0.00000004%. However, larger differences were found in the support areas. The X-coordinate differences were 58.58% and 64.29%, while the Y-coordinate differences were 33.28% and 40.00%. The moment of inertia differences were 4.32% and 4.01%. The manual method provides detailed calculation steps but requires more time. AutoCAD is faster and more efficient, especially for complex cross-sections. However, its accuracy depends on the drawing data and only represents gross cross-sectional geometry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Wu, Y. Gao, and Z. Tan, “Construction Technology and Quality Control of Reinforced Concrete Beam and Column Joints,” vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 205–208, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2025/v27i11379.

[2] C. Series, “Study on Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns and Beams Containing Recycled Brick Aggregate Study on Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns and Beams Containing Recycled Brick Aggregate”, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2694/1/012032.

[3] C. G. De Paiva and C. S. De Faria, “Analysis of the structural behavior of beam-column joints in reinforced concrete frames considering bending towards the reduced side of the cross section,” vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952025000300006

[4] O. Lm, O. Mm, O. St, and O. Mp, “Effective moment of inertia of reinforced concrete slender beams with only tension reinforcement,” vol. 9, pp. 33–41, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/jcees

[5] K. Van Voorthuizen, M. Iqbal, A. Rasheed, J. Schilder, and M. Ellenbroek, “Approximating the inertia forces in the floating frame of reference formulation using the consistent finite element,” Acta Mech., 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00707-025-04247-3.

[6] F. Xiao, W. Zhu, X. Meng, and G. S. Chen, “Parameter Identification of Frame Structures by considering Shear Deformation,” vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/6631716.

[7] F. Zimmert and T. Braml, “Free-form reinforced concrete , prestressed concrete , and composite components : Calculation of cross-section values,” no. October 2023, pp. 95–106, 2024, doi: 10.1002/cend.202300010.

[8] D. I. K. Sjøberg and G. R. Bergersen, “Construct Validity in Software Engineering,” vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1374–1396, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2022.3176725.

[9] E. Rizaldi, Y. D. Setiyarto, P. Studi, T. Sipil, and U. K. Indonesia, “Pengembangan Software Visual Basic 6 . 0 Sebagai Perhitungan Section Properties Pada Penampang Girder,” vol. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/crane

[10] I. O. Biology and J. M. Huie, “SegmentGeometry : A Tool for Measuring Second Moment of Area in 3D Slicer”, doi: 10.1093/iob/obac009.

[11] P. Dumka and D. R. Mishra, “The Shoelace Algorithm In Engineering : Python Applications For Area And Inertial Analysis,” vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1637–1648, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol19iss3pp1637-1648

[12] A. I. Journal and M. N. Baba, “A recursive trapezoid-based algorithm designed to compute the strength- and stiffness-related geometric properties of beams with polygonal,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 10073–10097, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15397734.2024.2353324.

[13] L. Mei and Q. Wang, “Structural Optimization in Civil Engineering : A Literature Review,” 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020066

[14] M. Dzidziguri and T. Magradze, “AutoCAD File Types and Their Application in Civil Engineering,” 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.52340/building.2025.72.02.05

[15] M. Denk, M. Jäger, and S. Wartzack, “Symbolic Parametric Representation of the Area and the Second Moments of Area of Periodic B-Spline Cross-Sections,” pp. 476–492, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech4020027

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Nazmi Aprilla Wibowo, & Simon Petrus Hamonangan Simorangkir. (2026). Analysis of the Center of Gravity and Moment of Inertia of Concrete Beam and Column Cross-Sections Using Manual and AutoCAD Methods in a Simple Building: the Barracks of Infantry Bengkulu . Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan, 11(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v11i2.1722

Issue

Section

Jurnal CIVILA

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.