Comparison of Structure Design Between Bored Pile Foundations and Pile Foundations (Case Study: Industrial Worker I Batang Flower House Construction Project)

Authors

  • M Iqbal Surya Negara Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an
  • Nasyiin Faqih Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an
  • Agus Juara Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v8i1.1028

Abstract

Field surveys and laboratories found dense soil layers up to a depth of 14 m, so an alternative to drilled pile or pile foundations was used. This study aims to compare the pile and drilled pile foundation plans with the same soil data, loads, and dimensions. Analysis by calculating the pile foundation plan compared to the drilled pile foundation so that the planning results are obtained, soil bearing capacity, pile group efficiency, number of piles and drilled piles, RAB (budget plan), and drilled pile plans. Compared to 50cm square piles and 40×40cm square piles, the bearing capacity of a single pile (Qult) is 44.5 tons, and the bored pile foundation is 54.72 tons. The pile resistance (f) is 38.79 tons for piles with a diameter of 40 x 40 cm and 38.79 tons for drilled piles with a diameter of 50 cm. One pile's allowable pressure-bearing capacity (Pa) is 14.48 tons, and one drilled pile is 17.48 tons. The permissible tensile strength (Pta) for one pile is 11.64 tons, and for one drilled pile is 14.46 tons. The pile foundation requires 263 piles, and the bored pile foundation requires 258 piles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. J. Sánchez-Garrido, I. J. Navarro, and V. Yepes, “Evaluating the sustainability of soil improvement techniques in foundation substructures,†J Clean Prod, vol. 351, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131463.

hary Hardiyatmo, ANALISIS DAN PERANCANGAN FONDASI 2, Edisi ke dua. yogyakarta: gadjah mada ubiversity press, 2018.

F. Liu, H. Shao, and W. Zhang, “Comparative analysis about carbon emission of precast pile and cast-in-situ pile,†Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 514–525, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.101.

J. Ilmiah and T. Sipil, “EVALUASI STRUKTUR BAWAH PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN PASPAMPRES JAKARTA PUSAT,†2022.

“PETUNJUK TEKNIS PENGUJIAN TANAH J A A N U M U M.â€

“114612-ID-perencanaan-pondasi-tiang-pancang-dan-tiâ€.

V. H. Huynh, T. Nguyen, D. P. Nguyen, T. S. Nguyen, T. M. D. Huynh, and T. C. Nguyen, “A novel direct SPT method to accurately estimate ultimate axial bearing capacity of bored PHC nodular piles with 81 case studies in Vietnam,†Soils and Foundations, vol. 62, no. 4, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101163.

F. Novel, L. B. F. Sompie, and G. Y. Malingkas, “PERENCANAAN BIAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PERHITUNGAN BIAYA NYATA PADA PROYEK PERUMAHAN (STUDI KASUS PERUMAHAN GREEN HILL RESIDENCE),†Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2014.

H. T. Santoso et al., “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG PANCANG BERDASAR HASIL UJI SPT DAN PENGUJIAN DINAMIS.â€

F. Novel, L. B. F. Sompie, and G. Y. Malingkas, “PERENCANAAN BIAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PERHITUNGAN BIAYA NYATA PADA PROYEK PERUMAHAN (STUDI KASUS PERUMAHAN GREEN HILL RESIDENCE),†Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2014.

J. Pagehgiri, “EXTRAPOLASI Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untag Surabaya,†Juli, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 121–136, 2015.

M. R. Asmoro and A. Setiyono, “ANALISIS ANTARA PENGGUNAAN PONDASI BORE PILE DENGAN TIANG PANCANG (STUDI KASUS : GEDUNG DPRD KOTA SURABAYA)â€.

Y. Gao and Z. Ding, “Case study of post uplift in deep excavation of a subway station in thick soft clay using long pile foundations,†Underground Space (China), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 254–267, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.008.

M. R. Hidayatullah et al., “ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PONDASI JACK IN PILE DAN PONDASI BORED PILE PADA PEMBANGUNAN ASRAMA MAHASISWA LAKI-LAKI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INTERNASIONAL INDONESIA,†2021. [Online]. Available: http://jos-mrk.polinema.ac.id/

A. Guleria, “Structural Analysis of a Multi-Storeyed Building using ETABS for different Plan Configurations.†[Online]. Available: www.ijert.org

“SNI_03_1727_1989_Pedoman_Perencanaan_Pemâ€.

F. Hikmawan and A. Firmanto, “JURNAL KONSTRUKSI ANALISIS STRUKTUR PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN SEWA KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH,†2020.

“Beban minimum untuk perancangan bangunan gedung dan struktur lain Badan Standardisasi Nasional,†2013, [Online]. Available: www.bsn.go.id

B. S. Nasional, “Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung,†2012, [Online]. Available: www.bsn.go.id

“114612-ID-perencanaan-pondasi-tiang-pancang-dan-tiâ€.

R. Rodi Harefa and K. Indah Sari, “ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG PANCANG PADA PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG ASRAMA DAN DIKLAT,†Online.

“Prediksi Kapasitas Tarik Pondasi Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Uji Pembebanan Tarik Di Lapangan (Studi Kasus Di Suraba (1)â€.

A. Psychari and I. Anastasopoulos, “Combined loading of RC pile groups in clay accounting for N–M interaction,†Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 163, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107490.

G. Setya Budi, “PENGUJIAN KUAT TARIK DAN MODULUS ELASTISITAS TULANGAN BAJA (KAJIAN TERHADAP TULANGAN BAJA DENGAN SUDUT BENGKOK 45ï‚°, 90ï‚°, 135ï‚°).â€

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2023-03-15

How to Cite

Negara, M. I. S., Faqih, N., & Juara, A. (2023). Comparison of Structure Design Between Bored Pile Foundations and Pile Foundations (Case Study: Industrial Worker I Batang Flower House Construction Project). Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan, 8(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v8i1.1028

Issue

Section

Jurnal CIVILA