Seismic Performance Evaluation Of Building Structures Modified With Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBF)

Authors

  • Yanisfa Septiarsilia Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
  • Eka Susanti Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
  • Dita Kamarul Fitriyah Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
  • Dewi Pertiwi Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
  • Umbu Miron Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v11i1.1617

Keywords:

Optimization, Steel Structure, SCBF, Remodelling, Comparison

Abstract

The Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF) system utilizes diagonal steel bracing members to enhance structural stiffness and dissipate seismic energy, thereby reducing potential damage to primary structural elements. CBF systems are classified into Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBF) and Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames (OCBF), which are applied in high and moderate-to-low seismic regions, respectively. This study evaluates the modification of an existing 13-story hotel building into an SCBF system in accordance with the latest Indonesian seismic design provisions. The research methodology includes a literature review on SCBF design principles and the most recent SNI standards, preliminary design, numerical modeling, and dynamic analysis using SAP2000. The structural behavior parameters evaluated in this study include mass participation, fundamental period (time period), and interstory drift. The results indicate that both the existing structure with a Dual System (SMRF and shear wall) and the SCBF-modified structure satisfy the minimum 90% mass participation requirement specified in SNI 1726:2019, with the SCBF system achieving this criterion using fewer vibration modes. However, the evaluation of the fundamental period shows that the existing structure remains within the allowable code limits, whereas the SCBF-modified structure exceeds the maximum permitted fundamental period, indicating increased structural flexibility and insufficient lateral stiffness. In terms of interstory drift performance, both structural systems comply with the drift limits specified in SNI 1726:2019; nevertheless, the Dual System demonstrates superior lateral deformation control compared to the SCBF system.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the structural modification using the SCBF system in this study was not successful in replacing or outperforming the existing Dual System. Although the SCBF configuration meets certain code requirements, it does not provide adequate lateral stiffness nor improved seismic performance compared to the original structural system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Ahmed, A. Alhussein, and G. Nugroho, “Concentric Bracing Frame in Earthquake-Resistant High-Rise Buildings,” vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 81–97, 2024.

[2] N. Wayan, R. Kirani, I. N. Sinarta, and P. Aryastana, “Steel Structure Design with Concentric Brace Frame System Sukawati Market Building Block C,” vol. 10, no. 08, pp. 6624–6629, 2025, doi: 10.47191/etj/v10i08.53.

[3] I. Kairatun, E. Budiman, and M. Jamal, “Analisis Pushover Pada Struktur Baja Dengan Bresing Menggunakan SAP2000,” J. Teknol. SIPIL J. Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. sipil, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–64, 2019.

[4] A. Issa, S. Stephen, and A. Mwafy, “Unveiling the Seismic Performance of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames : A Comprehensive Review,” 2024.

[5] P. A. Pangestuti and B. Suswanto, “Analisis Performa Eccentrically Braced Frames ( EBF ) Vertikal Link Menggunakan Wide Flange ( WF ) Link,” vol. 19, pp. 247–256, 2021.

[6] L. S. Tiara and A. Rosyidah, “Respon struktur baja dengan sistem rangka breising konsentris 1,2,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 480–493, 2025.

[7] I. K. D. K. Tubuh, I. G. G. Wiryadi, and G. J. Pitra, “Perbandingan Perilaku Struktur Rangka Baja Bracing Tipe X Dengan Inverted-V,” J. Ilm. Tek. UNMAS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 96–101, 2025.

[8] M. M. Kumar, V. Anushya, and M. Poongothai, “Study On Concentric Steel Braced Frame Structure With Various Aspect Ratio Using Pushover Analysis,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 966–973, 2018.

[9] A. Abazar and T. Nima, “Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames ( CBFs ) Equipped with Crescent-shaped Braces ( CSBs ),” Civ. Eng. Infrastructures J., 2025, doi: 10.22059/ceij.2025.383680.2170.

[10] I. S. Sibagariang and S. D. Tarigan, “Analisis Struktur Portal Baja Dengan Sistem Rangka Bresing Konsentrik Khusus ( SRBKK ) Dengan Menggunakan Peta Gempa 2017,” J. REKAYASA Konstr. Mek. SIPIL, vol. 05, no. September, pp. 69–81, 2022.

[11] T. A. P and F. Zulkarnain, “Analisis Kinerja Dan Pengaruh Tata Letak Bresing Eksentris Pada Sistem Rangka Bresing Eksentris (Srbe) Tipe- D Pada Bangunan Setback Vertikal (Studi Literatur),” Prog. Civ. Eng. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.

[12] Y. Khademi and M. Rezaie, “Comparison Study of CBFs and EBFs Bracing in Steel Structures with Nonlinear Time History Analysis,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1157–1165, 2017.

[13] C. Amadio, L. Bomben, and S. Noe, “Design of X-Concentric Braced Steel Frame Systems Using an Equivalent Stiffness in a Modal Elastic Analysis,” MDPI-buildings, vol. 12, no. 359, pp. 1–23, 2022.

[14] C. Amadio, L. Bomben, and S. No, “Analytical Pushover Curves for X-Concentric Braced Steel Frames,” MDPI-buildings, vol. 12, no. 413, pp. 1–17, 2022.

[15] Saloma, Y. Idris, Hanafiah, and N. Octavianus, “Structural Behaviour of Steel Building with Diagonal and Chevron Braced CBF ( Concentrically Braced Frames ) by Pushover Analysis,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 716–722, 2017.

[16] A. Panjaitan, P. Hasibuan, R. Putra, and M. Afifuddin, “The Performance of Concentrically Braced Frames ( CBF ) in Chevron V Brace and Diagonal Configuration by Considering Various Frame Heights,” Aceh Int. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2023, doi: 10.13170/aijst.12.2.30848.

[17] A. Panjaitan, P. Hasibuan, R. Putra, M. Afifuddin, S. Bermansyah, and M. Haiqal, “Structural Performance of Single and Double- Section CBF Braces with Different Lengths Under Cyclic Loading,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2024, vol. 01003.

[18] N. A. Bachsin, I. Violeta, and Yulfiansyah, “Pengaruh Variasi Konfigurasi Posisi Diagonal Braced Cbf Terhadap Perilaku Struktur Rangka Baja 6 Lantai Di Kota Pontianak,” E-JOURNAL Teknol. INFRASTRUKTUR, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2025.

[19] W. E. Suprayitno, B. Sutriono, and R. Trimurtiningrum, “Studi Perbandingan Kinerja Struktur Rangka Bresing Konsentrik Khusus dan Struktur Base Isolation Dengan Analisis Pushover,” PRINCE, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 753–764, 2025.

[20] Andaryati and Y. Triwahyudi, “Castellated Steel Beams Efficiency By Topology Optimization,” Civilla, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2022.

[21] A. N. Santoso and Sumaidi, “Comparison of MRF and CBF Structural Response To Eartquake In Office Building Surabaya,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 152–165, 2022, doi: 10.28932/jts.v18i1.3623.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Septiarsilia, Y., Susanti, E., Fitriyah, D. K., Dewi Pertiwi, & Umbu Miron. (2026). Seismic Performance Evaluation Of Building Structures Modified With Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBF). Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan, 11(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v11i1.1617

Issue

Section

Jurnal CIVILA

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.